Catalytic Converters - Mazda Forums : MazdaWorld.org Mazda Owners Forum

MazdaWorld.org is the premier Mazda Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2004, 09:16 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 283
Default

Just wanted to get your opinion. I got a rust out leak coming out of the main catalytic converter - a sign that the 11 year old system is due for an overhaul. Considering the difference between the $1600 factory and the $600 aftermarket catalytic converter systems (btw how many cars out there use 3 catalytic converters and then two mufflers...thoughtful though expensive design, no?), I expect to make the obvious choice for my 929-pillaged wallet.

Before I whack the ol' cc, I just wanted to ask if anyone has experience to relate here?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2004, 02:25 AM
felixTibs's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 334
Default

Wow, you have 3 Ctas!!! My 1991 has two Cats and 2 mufflers. Each cat aftermarket runs about 150 on online si tes. OEM is probably the best you can get, but expect to pay for it. I think as long as you are running a fully aftermarket system instead of a mix between old and new, you should be ok.
__________________
IF YOU WANT REAL WEB CONTENT--->Try this crap instead!http://www.eyunta.com



I have a lot of warnings!

Quote:
It's like a beautiful girl that should be in a mental institution...you just keep hoping she'll get better!! But she never does.
Jupiter44 about the Mazda 929

Quote:
to own a 929 is a little like having a drop dead gorgeous girlfriend with a coke habit.
-Viceroy
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2004, 10:40 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 283
Default

Thanks for the response, Felix. I'm surprised this didn't generate more of a discussion. Is everyone still driving around on their original cat?

BTW I've notice that the two cat aftermarket makers are Bosel and Catco. The Bosel parts at least appear to be more expensive.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2004, 10:45 PM
felixTibs's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 334
Default

Imstarting to think I will have to buy a new cat for the driver side. Its so crusty and oil clogged from a nastyoil seep. You cant get them used, so I will roably by an aftermarket. **** OEm, not for a catalytic convertor or anything. Too expensive and the cat is a universal product.
__________________
IF YOU WANT REAL WEB CONTENT--->Try this crap instead!http://www.eyunta.com



I have a lot of warnings!

Quote:
It's like a beautiful girl that should be in a mental institution...you just keep hoping she'll get better!! But she never does.
Jupiter44 about the Mazda 929

Quote:
to own a 929 is a little like having a drop dead gorgeous girlfriend with a coke habit.
-Viceroy
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2004, 08:46 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 283
Default

I bringing this topic back to ask folks who've had cat converter experience whether they would recommend the OEM aftermarket replacement versions of the 2nd generation 929 (the ones I've come across are made by Catco) or if they'd lean toward the "freeflow" cat converter that uses a "honeycomb" inside to reduce emissions while being considerably less restrictive on airflow. I've read mixed reviews. Some reviews I've read extoll the freeflow style - that they are more technologically advanced, get significantly better throttle response, without any downside. Some others are less enthusiastic saying that the freeflow style hasn't made a big performance difference, sometimes fails state exhaust emissions tests, may wear out faster, and the precat embedded O2 sensors tend to trigger the Check Engine light.

So that's my situation, OEM aftermarket or the freeflow style?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2004, 10:43 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 283
Default

Me again. Y'know I've been assuming the original cat was pellet style, but perhaps it's the high flow honeycomb style. And the OEM replacement by Catco and others...Any chance that if the original was honeycomb, that they'd slip a pellet style as a replacement and still call it OEM-style?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.